Every governing document in this library moves through the same lifecycle, and its current position in that lifecycle is always visible on the document itself, not left to inference: Draft (being written, not yet ready for review) → Proposed (drafted and posted publicly, awaiting Board adoption โ the status every document in this library currently carries) → Adopted (formally approved by Board vote, per the Policy Adoption / Amendment Procedure, Phase 2, 2-38) → Superseded (replaced by a later version but retained, not deleted) or Retired (no longer applicable). Only the Board can move a document from Proposed to Adopted; the Records Officer cannot change a document's substantive status alone, though they do own the mechanical version marker day to day.
Each document carries a version marker (v1, v2, v3…) that increments on any substantive content change โ a new procedural step, a changed threshold, a corrected fact โ but not on a typo fix or formatting cleanup, which is noted in a changelog line instead of bumping the version. A single authoritative-copy location exists for every document: for anything published in this public library, that location is the library itself; for internal-only records, the Digital Governance Repository (6-02). No second "working copy" is ever treated as authoritative, even temporarily during a revision โ edits happen directly against the authoritative copy or a clearly marked draft, never in an untracked duplicate that could quietly diverge.
This matters most at the exact moment it's easiest to get wrong: when an officer is working from a printed or downloaded copy that quietly became outdated after a later revision. The rule is simple and absolute โ the version in the authoritative location always controls, and any copy elsewhere (a printout, an email attachment, a personal drive) is treated as potentially stale until checked against it. When a document is superseded, the prior version is archived with its version marker and adoption date intact, not deleted, so the Council can always answer "what did this policy say when that decision was made" โ a question that matters disproportionately during a dispute, an audit, or a CPD inquiry into past practice. The new version's adoption date is recorded per the Policy Adoption / Amendment Procedure (Phase 2, 2-38), and the Master Document Register (6-03) is updated the same day a status or version changes, never on a delay.