← Back to History & Precedents
Track A · Precedent Deep-Dive · Case File #1303

The Maggie Daley Blueprint

A single question, chased to the primary source: does the Chicago Park District ever give a defined slice of an existing park its own separate identity, while the parent park keeps operating around it? For Grant Park → Maggie Daley Park, the answer is now confirmed in CPD's own budget ledgers — and it is the closest modern blueprint we have found for Jackson Park → Bongo Beach.

1303Maggie Daley's own CPD budget/location number
2013Year 1303 first posted real payroll spending
19Jackson Park's number today
0Separate PACs created for Maggie Daley

This page does one thing only: it takes the single strongest modern precedent we've found — Grant Park's Daley Bicentennial Plaza becoming Maggie Daley Park — and holds it up against Bongo Beach's own 19-step formation path, field by field, with every claim marked as verified against a primary source, partially verified, or an open research target.

The verified timeline

Every entry below is sourced to a primary document — a government press release, an official CPD budget PDF, or a CPD Board legislative record — not to secondary reporting alone.

Pre-2012

Daley Bicentennial Plaza & Peanut Park, inside Grant Park

A 1970s-era plaza and adjoining green space occupy the northeastern portion of Grant Park — aging, underused, and administratively just part of Grant Park. Built in the mid-1970s on top of a new underground parking garage, the complex included a fieldhouse, tennis courts, an ice-skating rink, and Grant Park's first playground.

widely reported  Maggie Daley Park's own History page; CBS Chicago

Aug 25–26, 2012

The public announcement

Mayor Rahm Emanuel and former Mayor Richard M. Daley announce that a defined ~20-acre area — bounded by Randolph, Monroe, Columbus, and DuSable Lake Shore Drive — will become Maggie Daley Park.

verified  City of Chicago press release

Sept 12, 2012

The Board formally starts the naming clock — and awards Phase 1 construction

Two clean, unambiguous items, adopted 7–0: “Request to Initiate 45 Day Notice Period to Name North Grant Park in Honor of Maggie Daley” (item 10) authorizes the General Superintendent to open the required public-notice period; immediately after it, “Authorization to Enter Into a Contract for North Grant Park Renovation” (item 11) awards Phase 1 construction to James McHugh Construction Co., not-to-exceed $7,447,000 (bid opened July 11, 2012; Spec. #P-12017-01).

verified — primary source  Chicago Park District, Journal of Proceedings, Vol. 79, Regular Meeting of September 12, 2012, items 10–11. Searchable (not yet directly linked) via CPD's Legistar portal, which hosts digitized Journals of Proceedings back to 1869.

Dec 5, 2012

General Superintendent uses the name “Maggie Daley Park” at the Board's own public budget hearing

Presenting CPD's 2013 budget at the Board's public hearing, General Superintendent and CEO Michael Kelly names “the Bloomingdale Trail and Maggie Daley Park” among the district's signature capital projects — corroborating, on the record and on video, that the name was already in official use more than two months before the February 13, 2013 naming item.

verified — primary source (video)  CPD Board, 2013 Budget Public Hearing, Dec. 5, 2012, ≈3:40

Dec 12, 2012

“Maggie Daley Park” is already the name CPD uses internally

The Board authorizes a contract with MDE Thermal Technologies Inc. for chilled-water service “at Maggie Daley Park” (non-competitively procured, estimated $98,440/year) — nearly two years before the park opens, the Board's own paperwork is already calling it by its new name and provisioning it with dedicated utility service.

verified — primary source  Journal of Proceedings, Vol. 79, Regular Meeting of December 12, 2012, item 7. Searchable (not yet directly linked) via CPD's Legistar portal.

Dec 31, 2012

Maggie Daley Park is already on CPD's audited books — before the Board's naming vote

CPD's own 2012 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report — audited, signed financial statements, not a budget projection — lists “Maggie Daley Park redevelopment” by name among the District's active Construction in Progress projects as of December 31, 2012, six weeks before the Board's February 13, 2013 naming action below.

verified  CPD 2012 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, Management's Discussion and Analysis, Capital Assets

Feb 13, 2013

“Request to Officially Name North Grant Park in Honor of Maggie Daley”

This exact item title appears as item 8 on the agenda for the Board's regular meeting of February 13, 2013 — confirmed directly from the Journal of Proceedings, not secondary reporting. The specific resolution language and roll-call vote could not be reliably read from this section of the source document: the text extraction shows a page-layout artifact here — item titles and their adopted resolution text appear to be drawn from misaligned columns, confirmed by checking an adjacent item, #7, whose title is about Soldier Field but whose resolution text is plainly about an unrelated audit contract. A direct look at the original page image, rather than automated text extraction, is needed before quoting exact wording or a vote count for this item. Two other CPD Board meeting recordings on YouTube have been checked (Dec. 5, 2012 and Aug. 14, 2013 — see below) and neither is this meeting; a recording of the February 13, 2013 meeting itself, if one exists, is still an open research target.

confirmed to exist — exact text pending  Journal of Proceedings, Vol. 79, Regular Meeting of February 13, 2013, item 8 (pp. 171–172). Searchable (not yet directly linked) via CPD's Legistar portal.

During 2013

Operating identity 1303 goes live — before the park even opens

CPD's financial system posts real actual payroll spending — $152,662 — against a cost center literally labeled “Maggie Daley – 1303,” a full year before construction finished. A Park Supervisor of Recreation position already exists on the books. Notably, no Board item anywhere in Volume 79 states a park number for Maggie Daley the way other CPD naming/creation items do: a contemporaneous item elsewhere in Volume 79 reads “...For a New Park (Park No. 572)”; the December 5, 2012 budget hearing names the new “Park 553” then under design for South Lawndale; and the Board's own Committee on Programs and Recreation adopted a “Request to Officially Name Park 499” at the very same August 14, 2013 meeting that authorized Maggie Daley's Phase Two renovation contract (see below). All three of those are brand-new parks created from scratch — unlike Maggie Daley, which was carved out of an already-existing, already-numbered park (Grant Park). That may be exactly why Maggie Daley's own items never had to state a number of their own — consistent with 1303 having been assigned administratively rather than through a named Board vote.

verified  CPD 2015 Adopted Budget, p. 84

verified — primary source (video)  Park 553: 2013 Budget Public Hearing, Dec. 5, 2012, ≈13:06; Park 499: Regular Meeting of Aug. 14, 2013, 1:04:44, Committee on Programs and Recreation report, item 1

verified  CPD's 2013 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (audited): “During 2013, the Park District completed Ping Tom boathouse, Clark Park boathouse, and phase 1 of Maggie Daley Park” (Letter of Transmittal); “Maggie Daley Park redevelopment” is again named in the year-end Construction in Progress note

Aug 14, 2013

Board authorizes Maggie Daley Park renovation, Phase 2

The RFP for this phase (Spec. P-12017-02, 100% Bid Documents dated April 12, 2013, distributed to the pre-qualified pool April 16, 2013) named Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates as prime landscape architect — the same firm MVVA's own site credits with the finished 27-acre park. The Committee on Capital Improvements' report, adopted by the full Board at its regular meeting, lists “Authorization to Enter Into a Contract for Maggie Daley Park Renovation Phase Two” as item 1 — confirming construction continued in phases well into 2013, more than a year after cost center 1303 began posting real payroll spending. The contractor and contract amount were not read into the record at this meeting itself; independent reporting fills that gap: DNAinfo reported the Phase Two contract was a $42 million award to Walsh Construction Co. (Phase One, by contrast, went to McHugh Construction for roughly $7.5 million — consistent with the Sept. 12, 2012 entry above). CPD's own Legistar system is still the place to look for the underlying Board file itself. The same meeting's Committee on Programs and Recreation report, by contrast, adopted an unrelated item titled “Request to Officially Name Park 499” — a useful side-by-side reminder that when CPD names a park through the ordinary process, the item typically states a park number, something no Maggie Daley item in Volume 79 ever does (see the entry above).

verified — primary source (video) + secondary reporting  CPD Board, Regular Meeting of Aug. 14, 2013, 1:05:15, Committee on Capital Improvements report, item 1; contractor/amount via DNAinfo Chicago

Dec 2014

Maggie Daley Park opens

The park opens to the public with its signature ice-skating ribbon, climbing sculptures, and play garden. Mayor Rahm Emanuel cuts the ribbon on December 13, 2014.

verified  CBS Chicago; DNAinfo Chicago; Wikipedia; CPD facility page

Oct 8, 2014

CPD Board authorizes the management contract, by name

The Board authorizes the General Superintendent to contract with MB Real Estate Services, Inc. for management and operation of “Maggie Daley Park, Cancer Survivors Garden, and Peanut Park” — a five-year deal with five one-year extension options, awarded through a public RFP that drew four submissions.

verified  CPD Legistar File #14-2125-1008

2015–2016

1303 becomes a permanent, growing budget line

“Maggie Daley – 1303” carries a dedicated Park Supervisor and Physical Instructor, and account 626060 (“Maggie Daley Park Management”) is appropriated $3,579,000 in 2015 and $3,861,966 in 2016 — Grant Park continuing to exist, unaffected, around it. CPD's own park-by-park capital projects table separately lists “Park development – Maggie Daley Park” as complete in 2015, filed under the parent park's own capital-project record, GRANT (ULYSSES) – Park No. 24 — followed by “Maggie Daley – park improvements” and “Maggie Daley – pickleball courts,” both complete in 2018, filed the same way. That's the expected pattern, not a contradiction: capital-project accounting tracks work under the parent park's number, while the separate operating/payroll cost center (1303) is what carries the day-to-day budget line above.

verified  CPD 2015 Adopted Budget & 2016 Budget Appropriations PDF

verified  CPD Park Capital Projects 2011–2024 (table format), as of April 2024

Not yet found

The single instrument that created 1303

With the Journal of Proceedings now in hand for the entire naming period (Sept. 2012 – Feb. 2013), it's confirmed that none of the public Board items say “1303” or otherwise assign a park number — only the naming action itself. That narrows the remaining gap to one specific question: what internal, non-Board record (a property/GIS master entry, a Budget Office location code, an administrative order signed by the General Superintendent) activated cost center 1303 sometime between the February 2013 naming and 2013's first actual payroll postings. That's this case file's single sharpest FOIA target now.

open research target

Step-by-step: Bongo Beach vs. Maggie Daley

The same 19-step formation framework used on the OPC benchmark, this time run only against Maggie Daley Park — because it is a Chicago Park District case, not a federal one, most of the OPC's federal-review steps simply don't apply to either side. That absence is itself useful: it shows how much of the OPC comparison was never really about park classification at all.

The 16-field forensic matrix

The same 16-field transaction matrix proposed for tracing exactly how a CPD park gets subdivided — populated here with only what's been directly confirmed, with every remaining gap named rather than guessed at.

FieldFindingStatus
Before propertyGrant Park (downtown, 331 E. Randolph St., ~313 acres)verified
Before park numberPark No. 24. CPD's own “Grant (Ulysses) Park” facility page — 331 E. Randolph St., 312.98 acres, described as “Chicago's Front Yard” — is downtown Grant Park itself, not a separate park; “Grant (Ulysses)” is simply Grant Park's own full CPD name, honoring Ulysses S. Grant. Independently confirmed by CPD's official parks-boundary GIS dataset, which lists park_no 24.0, name “GRANT (ULYSSES),” at the same address. An earlier pass on this page mischaracterized this as a name collision with a different, small park — that framing was itself the error, now corrected.verified
Before facilityDaley Bicentennial Plaza and Peanut Park, built in the 1970s as facilities within Grant Parkwidely reported
Initiating governmental actorsCity of Chicago (Mayor Rahm Emanuel) and the Chicago Park District, jointly, with former Mayor Richard M. Daley at the public announcementverified
Initiating departmentNot independently confirmed which specific CPD department led the internal processopen
Initiating memorandumNot locatedopen
Map / plat / legal descriptionPublicly defined from day one: bounded by Randolph St., Monroe St., Columbus Dr., and DuSable Lake Shore Dr., ~20 acres. A formal CPD property-master plat has not been independently located.partially verified
Board committeeThe Sept. 12, 2012 renovation-contract item ran through the Committee on Capital Improvements; the naming-notice item on the same date sits under general Board business (following a Committee on Programs and Recreation item on the same agenda)verified
Board action typeConfirmed sequence: Sept. 12, 2012 – Board authorizes a 45-day public notice period to name the site (item 10) and awards the Phase 1 renovation contract (item 11); Feb. 13, 2013 – an item titled "Request to Officially Name North Grant Park in Honor of Maggie Daley" appears on the agenda (item 8, exact resolution text unconfirmed); Oct. 8, 2014 – Board authorizes the management contract.verified
Board vote / dateSept. 12, 2012: adopted 7–0 (both items). Feb. 13, 2013: item confirmed on the agenda; specific vote tally not reliably extractable from this pass, pending direct page review. Oct. 8, 2014: adopted (management contract, Legistar File #14-2125-1008).verified
New property / operational parkMaggie Daley Parkverified
New park number1303. Confirmed a third, independent way: the City of Chicago's own open-data portal, Chicago Park District Outdoor Event Permits, carries park_number = 1303 on every current Maggie Daley facility record (fieldhouse, courts, skating ribbon, Cancer Survivors Garden), against park_number = 24 for Grant Park facilities — a live, queryable government dataset, not just a static budget PDF.verified
Old-number dispositionGrant Park (No. 24) continues to exist and operate as its own parkverified
Effective date1303 was already posting real payroll expenditures during 2013 — before the park's December 2014 openingverified
GIS updateChecked directly against CPD's official parks-boundary GIS dataset (Chicago Data Portal, snapshot dated Nov. 4, 2016): it does not carry a separate polygon for Maggie Daley/1303. Park No. 24 measures 295.45 acres in that snapshot — about 17 acres less than the 312.98 acres CPD's own current Grant Park page reports — consistent with, but not proof of, Maggie Daley's footprint having been excluded from Park 24's boundary by that date without yet being drawn as its own numbered parcel. Whether a more recent GIS layer has since split it out is still open.partially verified
Facility / asset / budget reassignmentConfirmed: dedicated Park Supervisor and Physical Instructor FTEs, and a $3,579,000 (2015) / $3,861,966 (2016) “Maggie Daley Park Management” contract line (account 626060) under cost center 1303verified
PAC consequenceNo separate PAC was created. The existing Grant Park Advisory Council absorbed Maggie Daley into its own scope; its meetings are held at the Maggie Daley Fieldhouse.verified

Where this ranks among our precedents

Now that Maggie Daley's own budget identity is directly confirmed rather than inferred, it moves to the top of the list.

1

Grant Park → Maggie Daley Park (1303)

A modern (2012–2013), CPD-era creation of a separately numbered operating identity from a defined portion of a continuing parent park — verified directly against CPD's own budgets, not inferred from a park page's wording.

2

Chase Avenue Beach #1250 (voided)

A beach-specific carve-out from the larger Rogers Park/Beach system — the closest analog to a beach getting its own number, though the separation year and instrument are still unconfirmed.

3

Rutherford Sayre (1999 consolidation)

Modern CPD-era park-identity restructuring, running in reverse (merging, not splitting) — still proof the machinery exists and CPD has used it since 1934.

4

Seneca Park #1242

A separately numbered park identity with a well-documented property/lease history, though the original 1915 split predates modern CPD.

5

Lane Beach Park #1265

A small, standalone beach park — strong as a classification comparator, but not evidence of an actual CPD-initiated split.

Full detail on all nine precedents, including South Park's 1869 division and Maggie Daley's original writeup, lives on the History page and in the Formation Process Benchmarking comparator, both now updated with the 1303 correction.

The 1300-series family

Chasing the number series itself — not just the one precedent — turned up more members than expected, pulled directly from CPD's own 2015/2016 budget documents. Each of these is confirmed to exist as its own CPD budget cost center; which is not yet confirmed is which larger parent park each one was drawn from, so treat this as a lead, not a finished argument.

1301Haines Schoolparent park not yet confirmed
1303Maggie Daleyparent: Grant Park — confirmed above
1304Margate Fieldhouseparent park not yet confirmed
1307Tarkingtonparent park not yet confirmed
1308Columbus Park Refectoryparent: likely Columbus Park — not yet confirmed
1309Promontory Pointparent: likely Burnham Park — not yet confirmed
1268Midway Plaisancea separately numbered component of the same South Park lineage as Jackson Park itself

If even one more of these turns out to be a genuine parent-park carve-out like Maggie Daley, the “CPD has never done this” objection gets harder to make with every one we confirm. Next FOIA/research pass: pull the parent-park record for each of these before presenting them as precedents.

The honest limit of this precedent

A separate park number did not produce a separate PAC. This is the single most important caution this case file surfaces. Maggie Daley Park has operated under its own CPD budget/location identity since 2013 — over a decade — and no “Maggie Daley Park Advisory Council” has ever been formed. The Grant Park Advisory Council simply extended its own scope to cover it, meeting at the Maggie Daley Fieldhouse. That means winning Track A (park classification) for Bongo Beach would not automatically win Track B (a separate, registered BBPAC) — the two remain genuinely separate asks, exactly as the Formation hub's own “why both, why now” framing already assumes. This precedent should be presented to CPD as strong evidence for Outcome A's classification question, not oversold as proof that PAC recognition follows automatically.

Sources

  • M1 — Mayor Emanuel Names New Downtown Park in Honor of Maggie Daley. City of Chicago, Office of the Mayor, press release, August 25–26, 2012. Source link
  • M2 — Chicago Park District, 2015 Adopted Budget. “Maggie Daley – 1303” cost-center detail, p. 84, showing 2013 Actual, 2014 Budget, and 2015 Budget columns. Source link
  • M3 — Chicago Park District, 2016 Budget Appropriations. “Maggie Daley – 1303” cost-center detail carried forward, plus account 626060 (“Maggie Daley Park Management”) at $3,861,966. Source link
  • M4 — Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners, Legistar File #14-2125-1008, “Authorization to Enter Into a Contract with MB Real Estate Services, Inc. for the Management and Operation of Maggie Daley Park,” approved October 8, 2014. Source link
  • M5 — Grant (Ulysses) Park facility page. Chicago Park District. Confirms this is downtown Grant Park itself (331 E. Randolph St., 312.98 acres) — “Grant (Ulysses)” is Grant Park's own official CPD name, not a separate park. This page previously treated it as a distinct, unrelated small park; that was itself an error, corrected as of this pass. Source link
  • M6 — Grant Park Advisory Council. Confirms no separate Maggie Daley Park Advisory Council exists; GPAC's own scope and meeting location (Maggie Daley Fieldhouse) cover it. GPAC's own Facebook page; also listed on CPD's Advisory Councils directory.
  • M7 — Grant Park (Chicago). Wikipedia / Choose Chicago. 331 E. Randolph St., ~313 acres — the same park as “Grant (Ulysses) Park” (M5), corroborating that they are one entity, not two. Source link
  • M8 — Maggie Daley Park. Corroborating coverage of the December 2014 opening and the 20-acre project footprint: Wikipedia; CBS Chicago; DNAinfo Chicago.
  • M9 — Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners, Journal of Proceedings, Volume 79 (Annual Meeting of May 9, 2012 through the Regular Meeting of April 10, 2013), official record. Items cited: September 12, 2012 (items 10–11, pp. 82–83), December 12, 2012 (item 7), and February 13, 2013 (item 8, pp. 171–172, exact text unconfirmed — see the timeline entry above). A physical/scanned copy of this volume is held in the project's own research files; not yet linked to a public online copy, though it should be locatable via CPD's Legistar portal (see M12) — the exact record permalink is itself an open item.
  • M10 — Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners, 2013 Budget Public Hearing, December 5, 2012. Video recording; General Superintendent Michael Kelly names “Maggie Daley Park” among the district's signature capital projects at ≈3:40, and the new “Park 553” at ≈13:06. Source link (Maggie Daley Park mention); Source link (Park 553 mention)
  • M11 — Chicago Park District Board of Commissioners, Regular Meeting of August 14, 2013. Video recording; Committee on Programs and Recreation report, item 1, “Request to Officially Name Park 499,” adopted at 1:04:44; Committee on Capital Improvements report, item 1, “Authorization to Enter Into a Contract for Maggie Daley Park Renovation Phase Two,” adopted at 1:05:15. Source link (Park 499); Source link (Phase Two contract)
  • M12 — Chicago Park District Legistar, Legislation search portal. Per CPD's own Board of Commissioners page, this portal holds digitized Legislative Records/Journals of Proceedings from 1869–2014, searchable by year and document type. The source for M4's specific file, and the next place to search for the underlying Board/procurement file on the Phase Two renovation contract and for a direct, linkable record of the September 12/December 12, 2012 and February 13, 2013 Journal of Proceedings items (M9) — the search form requires a manual query and could not be executed automatically to produce direct permalinks for this pass. Source link
  • M13 — Daley Bicentennial Plaza / Peanut Park background. Maggie Daley Park's own History page; CBS Chicago, “Big Plans For Grant Park's Daley Bicentennial Plaza.”
  • M14 — City of Chicago Data Portal, “Chicago Park District – Outdoor Event Permits.” A live, queryable government dataset (not a static PDF) whose park_number field reads 1303 on every checked Maggie Daley facility record and 24 on every checked Grant Park facility record — independently confirming the 1303/24 split via a third, structurally distinct CPD data system (event permitting, alongside the Adopted Budget and the parks-boundary GIS). Source link
  • M15 — City of Chicago Data Portal, “Parks – Chicago Park District Park Boundaries” (CPD_Parks), GIS boundary dataset, snapshot dated November 4, 2016. Confirms Park No. 24, named “GRANT (ULYSSES),” at 331 E. Randolph St., 295.45 acres in this snapshot; carries no separate polygon for Maggie Daley/1303 as of that date. Source link
  • M16 — Maggie Daley Park's First Phase of Construction $31K Under Budget. DNAinfo Chicago, June 12, 2014. Confirms Phase 1 contractor (McHugh Construction, ~$7.5 million) and Phase 2 contractor (Walsh Construction Co., $42 million). Source link
  • M17 — Chicago Park District, 2012 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (audited). Management's Discussion and Analysis, Capital Assets note: “Construction in progress includes…Maggie Daley Park redevelopment…” as of December 31, 2012. Source link
  • M18 — Chicago Park District, 2013 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (audited). Letter of Transmittal: “During 2013, the Park District completed Ping Tom boathouse, Clark Park boathouse, and phase 1 of Maggie Daley Park.” Management's Discussion and Analysis again lists “Maggie Daley Park redevelopment” among active Construction in Progress projects as of December 31, 2013. Source link
  • M19 — Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates, Maggie Daley Park project page. Confirms MVVA as landscape architect for the finished 27-acre park, client Chicago Park District, completed 2013–2015. Cross-checked against a locally supplied extraction of CPD's Phase 2 RFP/Project Manual (Spec. P-12017-02, 100% Bid Documents dated April 12, 2013; distributed to the pre-qualified pool April 16, 2013), which names MVVA as prime landscape architect and Bryan Traubert, Michael P. Kelly, and Raffi Sarrafian (independently confirmed as CPD's Director of Purchasing in this period) as the named CPD officials — the RFP's own original host URL (assets.chicagoparkdistrict.com) no longer resolves, so only the independently-corroborable details from that extraction are used here. Source link
  • M20 — Chicago Park District, Park Capital Projects 2011–2024 (table format), as of April 2024. Lists, under GRANT (ULYSSES) – Park No. 24: “Park development – Maggie Daley Park” (complete, 2015), “Maggie Daley – park improvements” (complete, 2018), and “Maggie Daley – pickleball courts” (complete, 2018) — direct, official confirmation that capital-project accounting for Maggie Daley Park is filed under the parent park's own number, distinct from the separate operating cost center, 1303. Source link
Not a legal opinion. This is a research and advocacy document. Every figure and date above is either drawn directly from a primary government source (linked) or explicitly labeled open/unconfirmed. Anything marked “confirmed to exist — exact text pending” above should not be quoted or characterized to CPD or in any public-facing BBPAC material until it is directly verified against the source document.